(基本上最建議1, 2, 8) / (低預算看10)
1. TN + 240hz +1ms無限刷新派 :
BENQ XL2546 |
25" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
320 |
--- |
No sync |
AUO 8(6+frc) |
17~18k |
BENQ XL2540 |
25" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
400 |
--- |
No sync |
AUO M250HTN01.3 |
16~17k |
VIEWSONIC XG2530 |
25" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
400 |
--- |
Freesync |
AUO M250HTN01.0 |
16~18k |
AOC AGON AG251FZ |
25" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
400 |
--- |
Freesync |
AUO M250HTN01.0 |
13~16k |
ASUS XG258Q |
25" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
400 |
--- |
Freesync |
AUO 8(6+frc) |
14~15k |
ASUS PG258Q |
25" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
400 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO Q250HTA00 |
18~22k |
DELL AW2518H |
25" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
400 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M250HTN01.0 |
25~26k |
ACER XB252Q |
25" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
400 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO 8(6+frc) |
17~19k |
ACER XB272 |
27" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
400 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO 8(6+frc) |
20~23k |
理論上FPS最極致表現.
2.IPS + 2560x1440 + 144hz ⬆
ASUS PG279Q |
27" |
IPS |
2560x1440 |
165 |
4ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M270Q008 V0 |
22~26k |
ASUS MG279Q |
27" |
IPS |
2560x1440 |
144 |
4ms |
350 |
--- |
Freesync |
AUO M270DAN02.3 |
18~21k |
ACER XB271HU |
27" |
IPS |
2560x1440 |
165 |
4ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M270DAN02.6 |
23~29k |
AOC AGON AG271QG |
27" |
IPS |
2560x1440 |
165 |
4ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M270DAN02.3 |
25~27k |
VIEWSONIC XG2703-GS |
27" |
IPS |
2560x1440 |
165 |
4ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M270DAN02.3 |
24~27k |
EIZO FORIS FS2735 |
27" |
IPS |
2560x1440 |
144 |
4ms |
350 |
--- |
Freesync |
AUO M270DAN02.3 |
40k |
應該是目前綜合表現最強的陣營軍.
3.便宜+大畫面+曲面+144hz(*可能有文字可讀性問題, 看16樓文章)
ASUS VA326H |
32" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
300 |
1800R |
No sync |
SAMSUNG 8(No frc) |
11~15k |
AOC AGON AG322FCX |
32" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
250 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG 8(No frc) |
10~15k |
VIEWSONIC XG3202 |
32" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
6ms |
300 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG 8(No frc) |
12~14k |
PHILIPS 328C7QJSG |
32" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
250 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG |
10~16k |
算斤算兩買划算的極限派?
4.21:9大畫面+曲面+144Hz
SAMSUNG C49HG90DME |
49" |
VA |
3840x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG 10(8+frc) |
45k |
ACER Predator Z35 |
35" |
VA |
2560x1080 |
200 |
4ms |
300 |
2000R |
Gsync |
AUO M350DVR01.0 |
30~35k |
AOC AGON AG352QCX |
35" |
VA |
2560x1080 |
200 |
4ms |
300 |
2000R |
Freesync |
AUO M350DVR01.2 |
25~26k |
AOC C3583FQ |
35" |
VA |
2560x1080 |
160 |
4ms |
300 |
2000R |
Freesync |
AUO M350DVR01.0 |
24~28k |
BENQ XR3501 |
35" |
VA |
2560x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
300 |
2000R |
No sync |
AUO M350DVR01.0 |
28~34k |
LG 34UC89G |
34" |
IPS |
2560x1080 |
166 |
1ms |
300 |
3800R |
Gsync |
LG LM340WW2-? |
36~42k |
LG 34UC79G |
34" |
IPS |
2560x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
300 |
3800R |
Freesync |
LG LM340WW2-SSA1 |
20~29k |
ACER Predator Z301CT |
30" |
VA |
2560x1080 |
200 |
4ms |
300 |
1800R |
Gsync |
AUO M300DVR01.0 |
28~30k |
21:9高刷新率派
5.單純Gsync+VA派
ACER Predator Z271T |
27" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
300 |
1800R |
Gsync |
SAMSUNG LTM270HP02 |
22~25k |
ACER Predator Z271 |
27" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
300 |
1800R |
Gsync |
SAMSUNG LTM270HP02 |
17k |
6.單純Gsync+TN派
ASUS PG278QR |
27" |
TN |
2560x1440 |
165 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
? 8(No frc) |
19~20k |
ASUS PG278Q |
27" |
TN |
2560x1440 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M270Q002 V0 |
18~25k |
ASUS PG258Q |
25" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
400 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO Q250HTA00 |
19~20k |
ASUS PG248Q |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
180 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M240Q007 V0 |
13~18k |
ACER XB272 |
27" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
400 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO 8(6+frc) |
23k |
ACER XB270HU abprz |
27" |
TN |
2560x1440 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
? 8(6+frc) |
20k |
ACER XB252Q |
25" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
400 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO 8(6+frc) |
19~20k |
ACER Predator XB241H |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
180 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO 8(6+frc) |
15k |
DELL AW2518H |
25" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
400 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M250HTN01.0 |
26k |
DELL S2716DG |
27" |
TN |
2560x1440 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M270DTN01.5 |
24~26k |
DELL S2417DG |
24" |
TN |
2560x1440 |
165 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M238DTN01.2 |
17~21k |
7.單純Gsync+IPS派
ASUS PG279Q |
27" |
IPS |
2560x1440 |
165 |
4ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M270Q008 V0 |
22~26k |
ACER XB271HU |
27" |
IPS |
2560x1440 |
165 |
4ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M270DAN02.6 |
23~29k |
ACER XB270HU bprz |
27" |
IPS |
2560x1440 |
144 |
4ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M270DAN02.3 |
22~24k |
AOC AGON AG271QG |
27" |
IPS |
2560x1440 |
165 |
4ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M270DAN02.3 |
25~27k |
VIEWSONIC XG2703-GS |
27" |
IPS |
2560x1440 |
165 |
4ms |
350 |
--- |
Gsync |
AUO M270DAN02.3 |
24~27k |
LG 34UC89G |
34" |
IPS |
2560x1080 |
166 |
1ms |
300 |
3800R |
Gsync |
LG LM340WW2-? |
36~42k |
8.簡單護眼派(量子點)(*可能有文字可讀性問題, 看16樓文章)
SAMSUNG C32HG70QQE |
32" |
VA |
2560x1440 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
1800R |
Freesync |
LSM315DP01 |
22~23k |
SAMSUNG C27FG73FQE |
27" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
1800R |
Freesync |
LTM270HP02-G? |
20k |
SAMSUNG C27FG70FQE |
27" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
1800R |
Freesync |
LTM270HP02 |
18~20k |
SAMSUNG C24FG73FQE |
24" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
1800R |
Freesync |
LTM270HP02-? |
13~14k |
SAMSUNG C24FG70FQE |
24" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
1800R |
Freesync |
LSM236HP02 |
13~14k |
量子點技術本身就是種重新調整光譜的相關技術,
白光LED天生藍光突出能量太強的問題多少會被解掉不少.
9.沒預算極限+日本製最高品質+護眼要求派
EIZO FORIS FS2735 |
27" |
IPS |
2560x1440 |
144 |
4ms |
350 |
--- |
Freesync |
AUO M270DAN02.3 |
40k |
日本製造, 雖然是友達面板, 但可能有特別訂製版本, 色彩調校晶片配置等等一定比較細心,
還有EIZO自己的一些技術.
10. 低預算10K以下好選擇
PHILIPS 328C7QJSG |
32" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
250 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG |
10~16k |
AOC AGON AG322FCX |
32" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
250 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG 8(No frc) |
10~15k |
MSI Optix G24C |
24" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
250 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG 8(No frc) |
8~9k |
MSI Optix G27C |
27" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
8ms |
300 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG 8(No frc) |
10~13k |
SAMSUNG S25HG50FQE |
25" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
320 |
--- |
Freesync |
AUO M250HTN01.2 |
10~12k |
ASUS MG248Q |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
Freesync |
AUO M240Q007 V0 |
9~12k |
ASUS MG248QR |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
Freesync |
AUO M240Q007 V0 |
10~11k |
ACER XB240H |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
No sync |
AUO M240HW01 V8 |
9~10k |
BENQ XL2430T |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
No sync |
AUO M240HW01 V8 |
11~12k |
BENQ XL2430 |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
No sync |
AUO M240HW01 V8 |
11~15k |
BENQ XL2420Z |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
No sync |
AUO M240HW01 V8 |
11~13k |
BENQ XL2411 |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
No sync |
? 8(6+frc)? |
8~13k |
VIEWSONIC XG2401 |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
Freesync |
AUO M240HW01 V8 |
9~12k |
LG 24GM79G |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
Freesync |
AUO 8(6+frc) |
8~12k |
這10款皆有黑平衡類似功能, FPS玩家優先選擇.
(*黑平衡效果可能以BenQ最為佳)
(*TN+10K很有可能XG2401/24GM79G是最好的選擇)
11.32吋+2K+144hz
AOC AG322QCX |
32" |
VA |
2560x1440 |
144 |
4ms |
300 |
1800R |
Freesync |
AUO M315DVR01.0 |
16~17k |
目前市面上32吋2K/144hz只有兩款, 嫌三星面板可以選擇這款較便宜.
12.BENQ DyAc
BENQ XL2546 |
25" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
240 |
1ms |
320 |
--- |
No sync |
AUO 8(6+frc) |
18k |
DYAC可能是很有意義的新技術, 之後還會有XL2735上市
(3&8. 可讀性問題是因為三星面板"6像素顯色"結構)
個人認為這個144hz螢幕挑選部分.
只要努力思考一下這下面幾個問題, 然後把條件組合起來
自然就會有一個選單可以給每個人過濾了.
1.螢幕大小要幾吋?
2.16:9 or 21:9?
3.TN or VA or IPS?
4.Gsync or Freesync or Nosync?
5.解析度要?
6.平面 or 曲面?
7.預算拿得出多少?
(大部分最重要的問題是3 & 4 & 7)
希望每個人都可以有能力過濾出自己要的產品.
另外考慮10K左右便宜產品的人
注意採用AUO M240HW01 V8面板下面四款產品完全不推
原因是面板出廠日在2011年了(六年前), 而且是6bit+Frc產品, 而且沒有提供黑平衡
下列清單皆是(GN246HL猜的出來八成是)
ACER GN246HL |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
No sync |
? 8(6+frc) |
7~8k |
VIEWSONIC VG2401MH |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
No sync |
AUO M240HW01 V8 |
12~13k |
ASUS VG248QE |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
No sync |
AUO M240HW01 V8 |
9~11k |
而下面其他這7款M240HW01 V8面板產品,
至少有提供黑平衡功能, 對FPS玩家顯示暗處細節還是多少有魅力的
ACER XB240H |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
No sync |
AUO M240HW01 V8 |
9~10k |
BENQ XL2430T |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
No sync |
AUO M240HW01 V8 |
11~12k |
BENQ XL2430 |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
No sync |
AUO M240HW01 V8 |
11~15k |
BENQ XL2420Z |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
No sync |
AUO M240HW01 V8 |
11~13k |
BENQ XL2411 |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
No sync |
? 8(6+frc)? |
8~13k |
VIEWSONIC XG2401 |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
Freesync |
AUO M240HW01 V8 |
9~12k |
LG 24GM79G |
24" |
TN |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
350 |
--- |
Freesync |
AUO 8(6+frc) |
8~12k |
不過6Bit+Frc理論上表現一定沒有原生8Bit好.
然後240hz產品中也只會有6Bit+Frc面板(應該是刷新速度天生較快)
要買6Bit+Frc面板產品, 不如就直接攻頂240hz產品比較乾脆就是了(上面第一項)
考慮三星面板產品(下列清單應皆是)的人
ASUS VA326H |
32" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
300 |
1800R |
No sync |
SAMSUNG 8(No frc) |
11~15k |
VIEWSONIC XG3202 |
32" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
6ms |
300 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG 8(No frc) |
12~14k |
ASUS XG27VQ |
27" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
300 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG LTM270HP02-? |
14~15k |
ACER Predator Z271T |
27" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
300 |
1800R |
Gsync |
SAMSUNG LTM270HP02? |
22~25k |
ACER Predator Z271 |
27" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
300 |
1800R |
Gsync |
SAMSUNG LTM270HP02? |
17k |
ACER XZ271 |
27" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
300 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG LTM270HP02? |
13k |
這幾款都是不太推的唷!
32吋產品只有FHD解析度, 點距又非常大,
兩者也應該都是六像素顯色結構, 文字可讀性上可能比較費力.
又沒有三星不願提供給予其他廠商自己的絕活量子點技術.
PHILIPS 328C7QJSG |
32" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
250 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG |
10~16k |
AOC AGON AG322FCX |
32" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
4ms |
250 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG 8(No frc) |
10~15k |
而這兩款韓國評測有出來SRGB 125%屬性,
也許有三星量子點技術, 或者AOC/飛利浦有黑科技可以把量子點鍍膜塞進去.
不知道怎樣辦到Srgb 125%的, 還算可以考慮.
MSI Optix G27C |
27" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
8ms |
300 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG LTM270HP02? |
10~13k |
MSI Optix G24C |
24" |
VA |
1920x1080 |
144 |
1ms |
250 |
1800R |
Freesync |
SAMSUNG LSM236HP02? |
8~9k |
而MSI G24C/G27C雖然一樣, 6像素沒QD.
不過至少點距合理, 價錢便宜就是了(雖然保固一年)